men more socially disparaged in cross-dressing than women are

Saint Pelagia of Antioch

Social constraints on men are tighter than those on women. For example, men are punished more severely than women for the same crimes, and men’s sexuality is much more harshly regulated. Societies exploit men as tools for producing goods and fighting wars. Social policing keeps most men within those narrow roles. Comparing social valuations of cross-dressing men and women in a rhetorical exercise of the sixth-century Roman sophist Choricius of Gaza and hagiography of Saint Pelagia shows tighter social constraints on men.

In Choricius’s rhetorical exercise, a general wore women’s clothing to defeat his city’s enemies. A prior general had recently suffered a terrible defeat for the city. The city was then besieged and in grave danger. Seeing no alternative, the second general dressed in women’s clothing and made a nocturnal ambush on the enemy. The second general thus saved the city and became a war hero. The city had a law that a war-hero be memorialized in a painting depicting him carrying out his heroic acts. That would mean memorializing the general in a representation of him wearing women’s clothes.

The general argued strongly against memorializing him in women’s clothing. He declared that a man wearing women’s clothing is “unseemly” and “completely inappropriate for me.” The general put on women’s clothing because that was necessary to protect his city’s women:

I saw that, since our strength had grown weaker and the enemies’ increased, the situation demanded some special contrivance from me; I was pondering how to rebuild the city after it was conquered and was considering the other wretched things that conquest usually causes, especially the most bitter thing of all, the customary excess of the enemy while they hold power in the city, when they outrage bedrooms, assault maidens, and do not spare the bloom of youth. I did not hesitate, you see, to appear as a woman to the enemy so that I might rescue the women from their excess, nor to dress unnaturally so that the youth might not suffer anything unnatural. [1]

Without suffering social disparagement, men typically can’t wear women’s clothing, or even clothing that mimics the freedom of women’s clothing. To wear women’s clothing, men need a special justification. Under gynocentrism, claiming to be protecting women serves as special justification for doing anything.

Women have much more privilege with respect to cross-dressing. Consider, for example, a tenth-century account of the life of Saint Pelagia. Pelagia was a leading actress-dancer in Antioch. She converted to Christianity and became an ascetic monk who lived in a small cell in Jerusalem. Pelagia as a monk became a man renowned for piety and working miracles. When Pelagia died, monks gathered from afar for her funeral:

When they approached the body and extended their hands to anoint it with perfumed oil, they saw a strange sight: a woman, who had been concealing her gender, and who like a man had performed deeds of men, and indeed obtained for her labors even greater benefit than men. [2]

Women commonly get greater benefits than men for the same labor. Women also have more social freedom than men. Pelagia was greatly honored as a cross-dressing woman:

Everyone began to strive equally, each trying to outdo the other, competing to attend the funeral, and vying just to come near the body and to even touch some part of it. In this way, with many candles, and even greater honor, the honorable body of Pelagia was buried, escorted and carried by holy and pious men.

Pelagia came to be widely regarded as a saint. As a woman, Pelagia had the freedom to dress as a woman or as a man without suffering social disparagement and shaming.[3]

The type of clothing that one wears is much less important than experiencing the human capabilities of being alive and having sex. Nonetheless, anti-men gender inequality in cross-dressing is telling. Men historically have been constrained to a relatively narrow gender role. More and more enlightened persons are condemning oppressive social constraints on men’s lives and advocating for men’s liberation.

*  *  *  *  *

Read more:

Notes:

[1] Choricius of Gaza, Declamation 11 (“<The War-Hero>”) sec. 33-4, from Greek trans. Terry L. Papillon in Penella (2009) p. 227. The general described his wearing women’s clothing as “completely inappropriate for me” and “unseemly” in sec. 104-5, trans. id. p. 239. Robert Penella has pointed out that Choricius, in his Defense of Mimes, defended mimes cross-dressing on the stage. Choricius thus challenged Christian criticism of secular theater.

[2] Symeon Metaphrastes, Menologion, “Life and Conduct of Saint Pelagia of Antioch” para. 25, from Greek trans. Papaioannou (2017) pp. 81, 83 (Greek on facing pages). The subsequent quote is from para. 26, trans. id. p. 83. The life of Saint Pelagia is set in the fifth century in the area of Antioch, Jerusalem, the Jordan, and Jericho. It apparently first appeared in Greek, and then spread to Latin, Syriac, Arabic, Armenian, Georgian, Slavonic, and then European vernaculars. Id. p. 289, introductory note.

The life of Pelagia affirms the goodness of men’s heterosexual propensity to gaze upon physically beautiful women. That’s a marginalized counterpoint to the gynocentric practice of condemning and criminalizing men gazing upon physically beautiful women.

[3] Women’s freedom in cross-dressing can also seen in the ancient life of Saint Eugenia. Eugenia revealed her cross-dressing to refute a false accusation of rape. She endured no disparagement or shaming for her cross-dressing. To the contrary, she was affectionately embraced and publicly honored. After serving as the abbot of a men’s monastery, she went on to lead young women in Christian devotion. For Symeon Metaphrastes’s life of Saint Eugenia, Papaioannou (2017) pp. 184-261.

[image] Pelagia before and after her conversion. Detail of illumination from the tenth-century Menologion of Basil II, Vatican Library, Ms. Vat. gr. 1613, image 98. Thanks to the Vatican Museum and Wikimedia Commons.

References:

Papaioannou, Stratis, ed. and trans. 2017. Christian novels from the Menologion of Symeon Metaphrastes. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, Vol. 45. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Penella, Robert J., ed. 2009. Rhetorical exercises from late antiquity: a translation of Choricius of Gaza’s Preliminary talks and declamations. Cambridge: Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

6 thoughts on “men more socially disparaged in cross-dressing than women are”

  1. Cross-dressing…better known as “transvestism” in the Current Era…is sort of a cousin to the transgender and transsexual conditions…in the context of society’s reaction to its manifestation.

    The premise of your article…that the male is far more severely penalized for his decision to appear female than the female would be for seeking to appear as male…has often been (completely incorrectly) explained as castigation for the member of the supposed but illusory superior male gender “lowering himself” by wanting to be female.

    This is, of course, a fallacious corollary to the Greatest Lie of All Time…that males are the privileged, ruling class.

    Readers of Mr. Galbi’s fine blog are quite cognizant of the fact that the precise opposite is true…males are the Slave Gender…while females represent the Master Class.

    Why do males hate M2F transwomen so much?
    Is there anything a slave hates more than an escaped slave?
    Why so some women hate M2F transgender women? Because that once slave has now transmuted into an equal; a member of the Ruling Class…no longer can this “new” woman be exploited…she must be respected and treated with courtesy.

    In the Old Days, during segregation, they had things called minstrel shows where white racists would laugh at a white man in what they called “black face”…it was considered “amusing” for a white person to act black…and socially acceptable in that era….just as a woman acting “mannish” is never really frowned on much by society…the so-called tomboy.

    The Ruling Class can always feign membership in the lower castes without social stigma.
    But, in those same olden days…if a black person seemed to be acting “white”…he or she would be the target of acid criticism by both blacks and whites…acting “uppity”….acting “bougie”…”gettin’ above your raisin’”. Even today you sometimes see this. Same is true when a man declares he wants to be female….”sissy”….”queer”…and plenty of other nasty names will be directed at him….because of his efforts to leave the slave gender and join the Ruling Female Class.

    Most of the invective will come from other males; for the utterly obvious but willfully ignored reason I listed above. Slaves don’t really need slave masters…they absolutely excel at enforcing their own thralldom.

    The insanity that pervades the human psyche is quite an interesting thing to observe….

  2. The Grand Duchess wrote:

    This is, of course, a fallacious corollary to the Greatest Lie of All Time…that males are the privileged, ruling class.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Since I’m here; I might as well throw in an additional corollary to the above as a bonus!

    *Hopes this isn’t starting to sound like geometry class*

    The concept that men objectify women….

    The fact is, quite the opposite is true…women objectify men all the time…they see a “provider” (a euphemism for a walking ATM), a “protector” (a euphemism for a meat shield), and a “partner or soulmate” (euphemisms for what she deems a walking dildo / sex toy). What they do *not* see is an equal in almost all cases and another human being the majority of the time.

    The man, on the other hand, *subjectifies* the female. Since most heterosexual males entire world revolves around female approval…when he comes before a woman, he very much sees a human being. However, since he does not see *himself* as a human being, he absolutely cannot meet her as an equal.

    “Can’t look in Her eyes; she’s out of my league…”
    ___She’s Like the Wind

    Life imitates art…or something like that.

    Anyway, Chinzweiu trenchantly observed the following:

    “Males are generally raised to worship women; while females are generally raised to worship themselves. When the two meet, can there be any doubt as to who will rule who?”

      1. Yes, that is him. His book “The Anatomy of Female Power”…penned circa 1990…is in the mold of Esther Vilar’s The Manipulated Man…but actually a good deal more insightful.

  3. The Princess wrote:

    This is, of course, a fallacious corollary to the Greatest Lie of All Time…that males are the privileged, ruling class.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Hitler and Goebbels were reprehensible beyond comprehension; but they made two accurate observations:

    “A lie told enough times becomes the truth.”

    “The bigger the lie; the more likely the people are to believe it.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Current month ye@r day *