Month: May 2011
contraband cellphones prevalent in prisons and jails
Contraband cellphones have become one of the most important issues for prison and jail administrators. Contraband cellphone confiscations in Mississippi and California have increased about six-fold from 2007 to 2010. Despite the sharp increase in confiscations, in Mississippi State Penitentiary (Parchman) in August, 2010, the average number of contraband cellphones confiscated monthly amounted to only about 14% of the total stock of contraband cellphones in the prison. At Parchman and at Brockbridge Correctional Facility in Maryland, managed access technology detected one active contraband cellphone per roughly nine prisoners.[1] That’s about the usual ratio for authorized wireline inmate telephones officially installed in prisons.
Prisoners describe contraband cellph0nes as prevalent in prisons. According to a prisoner in a state prison in Georgia:
Almost everybody has a phone. Almost every phone is a smartphone. Almost everybody with a smartphone has a Facebook.
A prisoner recently released from a state prison in California described a major change in communication device use:
The prison system is mad because nobody uses the phones on the wall [authorized inmate phones] anymore…. I think the only time people would use the wall phones was to call their people [outside prison] and get another cellphone.
Another recently released prisoner explained:
for every person doing something illegal [with a contraband cellphone], there are hundreds of guys who just want to talk to their families and keep in touch with what’s going on back home. … They’re talking to their mamas, their wives, looking at photos, checking on their Facebook pages.[2]
Because calling costs on contraband cell phones are much lower than calling costs on authorized inmate telephone systems, inmates can afford to make more calls to family and friends. Contraband cellphones thus keep prisoners occupied and calm, and help prisoners maintain outside relationships important for their re-integration into society upon release. However, because contraband cellphones lack the call control and call recording technologies of inmate phone systems, contraband cellphones increase public safety risks and lessen forensic resources for prosecuting crimes. In addition, prisons and jails receive a share of revenue from authorized inmate telephone calls. Jail and prison revenue from inmate telephone calls probably amounted to more than half a billion dollars in 2010. Given the current, very difficult fiscal positions of many local and state governments, reductions in inmate telephone revenue is a significant concern.
Key challenges for suppressing contraband communications technologies in prisons and jails are costs, technological change, and use incentives. Managed access systems can block calls from contraband cellphones. The managed access system installed at Parchman cost about $850,000. Managed access systems that are being installed in the two other Mississippi state prisons are expected to cost about $2.1 million.[3] Installing managed access in all 33 California state prisons is expected to cost from $16.5 million to $33 million.[4] Rapid development of wireless communication technology — 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, LTE, etc — is likely to create continual suppression technology costs and challenges. If those system costs are incorporated into the cost for inmate calls over the authorized inmate telephone system, that will further increase incentives to use contraband communication devices.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCqAtUV91uw
The 2011 National Public Safety Technology conference featured interesting discussions of cutting-edge contraband communication device suppression technologies. Contraband cellphones have significant implications for system economics and prisoner re-entry. Serious discussion of these issues is also needed.
* * * * *
Data: contraband cellphone confiscations and steady-state contraband model (Excel version)
Related: prisoners keen to use phones
Notes:
[1] Managed access technology was tested in December, 2009, at the Brockbridge Correctional Facility in Jessup, MD. It detected 82 cell phones attempting to make calls at a prison with an average daily population of 640 men. A managed access system installed at the Mississsippi State Penitentiary at Parchman in August, 2010 detected on average about 400 contraband cell phones attempting to make calls during that month. The average daily population of Parchman during that month was 3,469 prisoners. See Maryland, Non-Jamming Cell Phone Pilot Summary, p. 4; Casey Joseph, Tecore Networks, 2011 National Public Safety Technology Conference, Session 4, video time 26:15; Maryland DOC Annual Report 2010, p. 30; Mississippi Operation Cellblock, p. 33; Mississippi Department of Corrections, Daily Inmate Population, August 2010.
[2] The above quotes from prisoners are from: Kim Severson and Robbie Brown, “Outlawed, Cellphones are Thriving in Prisons,” New York Times, Jan. 2, 2011; Sandy Banks, “Allowing phones in the cells might be a sound call,” Los Angeles Times, Mar. 26, 2011; Jack Dolan, “Prisons seek ally in crackdown on cellphones,” Los Angeles Times, Apr. 11, 2011.
[3] Ken North, Mississippi Dept. of Corrections, 2011 National Public Safety Technology Conference, Session 2, video time 46:07.
[4] Dolan, “Prisons seek ally,” reporting statement of Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
thank a public servant
In many countries across the world, May 1 is celebrated as International Workers’ Day. The U.S. does not celebrate that holiday. Instead, the U.S. has a full week, May 1 through May 7, designated as Public Service Recognition Week. Public servants deserve appreciation:
Whether at the federal, state, county or local level, public employees throughout the nation provide essential services, solve and prevent serious problems, help ensure our safety and advance the common good. During Public Service Recognition Week, the first week of May, we hope you will join our effort to honor public servants at all levels of government for the work they do to make our country a better place.
Without public servants, private enterprise would be nasty, brutish, and short. Thank a public servant today!
COB-58: benefits of bureaucratic empires
Bureaucrats are renowned for empire-building. Less widely appreciated is the enduring value of being part of a bureaucratic empire. A four-scholar task force centered in Germany recently issued a relevant report. The report concerns the Habsburg Empire, which slowly coalesced from the efforts of the House of Habsburg in central Europe beginning in the eleventh century. By 1740, the ruler of the Habsburg Empire, Maria Theresa, had gained the following title:
Maria Theresa, by the Grace of God, Dowager Empress of the Romans, Queen of Hungary, of Bohemia, of Dalmatia, of Croatia, of Slavonia, of Galicia, of Lodomeria, etc.; Archduchess of Austria; Duchess of Burgundy, of Styria, of Carinthia and of Carniola; Grand Princess of Transylvania; Margravine of Moravia; Duchess of Brabant, of Limburg, of Luxemburg, of Guelders, of Württemberg, of Upper and Lower Silesia, of Milan, of Mantua, of Parma, of Piacenza, of Guastalla, of Auschwitz and of Zator; Princess of Swabia; Princely Countess of Habsburg, of Flanders, of Tyrol, of Hennegau, of Kyburg, of Gorizia and of Gradisca; Margravine of Burgau, of Upper and Lower Lusatia; Countess of Namur; Lady of the Wendish Mark and of Mechlin; Dowager Duchess of Lorraine and Bar, Dowager Grand Duchess of Tuscany
Lesser empires typically don’t feature titles any bigger than Senior Executive Vice President for the Administrative Group. The Habsburg Empire’s day-to-day functioning pioneered the consistency, reliability, and predictability that characterize a stolid bureaucracy:
Despite the national aspirations of the peoples within the [Habsburg] empire, some aspects of Habsburg policy were widely accepted. In particular, the bureaucracy throughout the empire was well respected by the population because of its reliability.
Most persons don’t want innovation. They want reliability. A good bureaucracy delivers unthinkable reliability.
Despite the Habsburg Empire’s abolition in 1918, it continues to have enduring effects. The report’s intricate and extensive econometric work has established that historical affiliation with the Habsburg Empire “increases current trust and reduces corruption in courts and police.”[*] The effects of a bureaucratic empire thus live on long after it has been formally eliminated. Since every organization needs more trust and less corruption, if your organization doesn’t have a bureaucratic empire, start building one at your next meeting.
In other bureaucratic issues this month, new Google CEO Larry Page reportedly “has made a series of moves to cut through the firm’s 24,000-person bureaucracy.” That’s pointless. Page instead should form a committee to study the Habsburg Empire and to produce a report on how Google can emulate the Habsburg’s bureaucracy. Page reportedly has also “asked that employees develop new practices for meetings, such as designating a decision-maker and refraining from working on their laptops.” The key to improving meetings, just like improving piano-playing, is practice. If Google wants to have better meetings, it needs to start having more meetings.
Given the importance of meeting practices, the meeting boycott movement should be harshly crushed for the sake of public welfare and prosperity. In 2004, Frederick P. Cerise, the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, officially proclaimed a No Meeting Day. Mr. Cerise is no longer Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals. We hope that Mr. Cerise was swiftly and painfully punished by the organization responsible for bureaucratic excellence.
That’s all for this month’s Carnival of Bureaucrats. Enjoy previous bureaucratic carnivals here. Nominations of posts to be considered for inclusion in next month’s carnival should be submitted using Form 376: Application for Bureaucratic Recognition.
* * * * *
[*] Becker, Sascha O; Boeckh, Katrin; Hainz, Christa; Woessmann, Ludger (2011). “The Empire Is Dead, Long Live the Empire! Long-Run Persistence of Trust and Corruption in the Bureaucracy,” CESifo Working Paper No. 3392. Quotes above are from p. 7 and the abstract.