One of Virginia’s finest, Mitch in action:
COB-31: honor and glory

Perhaps the most important government bureaucrats are tax collectors. Tax collectors, like other bureaucrats, tend to be humble and self-effacing. Yet no one should doubt the honor and glory that tax collectors and other quintessential bureaucrats will ultimately receive.
A leading communications industry analyst long ago warned of misunderstanding bureaucrats. He set out the example of an ordinary, foolish person. This person declared: “God, I thank you that I am not like other people: thieves, rogues, adulterers, or even like this tax collector.” With a keen sense of bureaucratic decorum, the tax collector ignored the out-of-line fool, looked up to heaven, beat his breast, and said, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner!” Bureaucrats recognize that everyone is like everyone else, including themselves. Have no doubt, bureaucrats’ keen appreciation for essential uniformity will bring them honor and glory.
Chris Davies, MEP, observes that “close up, Brussels bureaucrats usually seem like ordinary human beings.” They are, and they know it. You are, too, and even if you don’t know it, you will be treated like everyone else.
winterspeak continues to question fundamental macroeconomic orthodoxy. Bureaucrats are a society’s best defense against fundamentalists.
Helen DeWitt at paperpools discusses Zygmunt Bauman’s book, Modernity and the Holocaust. This book apparently assigns bureaucracy the blame for the Holocaust. DeWitt adds, “I’m afraid no school or university I ever attended showed any awareness of the moral implications of its bureaucratic structures.” We bureaucrats here at the Carnival of Bureaucrats are dedicated to raising awareness of the moral implications of bureaucracy. We encourage DeWitt to establish a committee to study whether to recommend that educational administrators order teachers and professors to direct their students to read this blog. Teachers and professors would then, in accordance with standard institutional procedure, grade students on their comprehension of it.
The Jobbing Doctor describes as “a marvel” a letter from a Professor Sue Hill, the UK Government’s senior scientific officer and a highly skilled bureaucrat. We applaud the Jobbing Doctor for his appreciation of bureaucracy.
Tim Bryce at ToolBox for IT displays his complete misunderstanding of bureaucrats. He declares:
we had to deal with government regulators who issued permits, inspectors and others who supervised construction. I think it’s good that we have such checks and balances, but I’m disturbed by the inordinate amount of red tape they create. I also find such bureaucrats to be a temperamental lot who changes their minds at the drop of a hat.
These persons are entrepreneurs, not bureaucrats. Bureaucrats do not change at the drop of a hat.
Matt Steinglass at Accumulating Peripherals compares bankers to bureaucrats. He notes, “financial institutions appear to be able to waste money at an astronomical pace that simply dwarfs the excesses of any government bureaucracy (except perhaps the Pentagon).” We believe that the excesses of government bureaucracy are excessively exaggerated. In contrast, the waste of financial institutions has been totally unappreciated, at least until now.
That’s all for this month’s Carnival of Bureaucrats. Submit your blog article to the next edition using our carnival submission form. Submissions should conform to the Carnival’s regulations. Past editions of the Carnival of Bureaucrats can be found on the Carnival’s category page.
economists
Economists appear to aspire
to something like a science
of whether, to say with authority:
cirrhosistratus leads to cumuloincubus
with a chance four out of five.
They do this to gain
status in society.
At their best economists
are dull poets.
They grope
for a chair or a doorknob
when others speak of
building a new society.
They hammer on
simple metaphors:
the price, the cost,
economic man,
markets,
an invisible hand.
Wednesday's flowers

shrinking paper directory advertising
The local paper directory business is shrinking rapidly. Consider Yell Group, which publishes Yellowbook and describes itself as “a leading international directories business operating in the classified advertising market through print, online and phone-based media in the United Kingdom, United States, Spain and Latin America.” The Yell Group’s presentation of financial results for the first half of accounting year 2009 (April through September, 2008) doesn’t describe an imminent business crisis. Yell Group’s stock, however, has declined precipitiously across calendar year 2008 and is now trading about 14% of its value at the beginning of 2008.

The Yellowbook for Alexandria City, Arlington County, and Fairfax County, Virginia, indicates a major directory advertising contraction. The main business components of the directory are yellow pages (classified business advertisements, customized advertising texts and graphics), white pages (alphabetical business listings, no advertising text, but some paid block size and color levels), and coupon pages (10 standard-size coupons per page). The “2008” Yellowbook had 1546 yellow pages, 303 white pages, and 40 coupon pages. The “2009 2010” Yellowbook has 1162 yellow pages, 260 white pages, and 28 coupon pages. Most of the directory’s advertising revenue undoubtedly is from the yellow pages. Thus this directory’s advertising revenue has probably fallen by more than 25%. If the directory is for two years, compared to the previous one-year directory cycle, then the undiscounted two-year advertising revenue is down by more than 63%. Remember that this has occurred just in the beginning of what is likely to be a long and deep macroeconomic contraction.
My apartment building hints at the business problem. The building has 11 occupied apartments, excluding mine. About two weeks after a stack of Yellowbook directories were deposited outside the entryway, 9 books remained. This remaining stack of Yellowbooks disappeared shortly thereafter. I guess that the condo maintenance person threw them out. Thus perhaps only 2 out of 11 residents (plus one communications industry economist) even was interested enough to pick up the directory.
Rapidly shrinking local paper directories are a sign of the enormous change that the Internet is fostering.