Child support has become a misleading policy term meaning not love and care for a child, but monetary sex payments legally imposed highly disparately on men. Child support is part of the state regime regulating men’s sexuality and imposing unplanned parenthood (forced fatherhood) on men. Child support laws have generated imprisonment of men, without the benefit of counsel, for sex payment (“child support”) debt. The U.S. Supreme Court case Turner v. Rogers, 387 S. C. 142, 691 S. E. 2d 470 (2011) addressed this sordid state of affairs.
In 1871, the Supreme Court of Minnesota in Olson v. Johnson made clear that unmarried fathers essentially have the legal status of wallets. … Read the post fathers as wallets: legal history of child support & custody
Built upon the gynocentrism that humans share with other primates, anti-men gender discrimination in child custody is deeply entrenched historically. … Read the post gender discrimination in child custody prevalent historically
Courts have forced financial fatherhood (“child support”) upon men despite a written preconception contract and women’s contraceptive fraud. … Read the post contract & fraud irrelevant to forced financial fatherhood
Richeut provides medieval estates satire addressing paternity establishment, paternity fraud, and child support. This satire remains relevant today. … Read the post Richeut: 12th-century tale of paternity fraud & child support
In the great America tradition of progressive social reform, Cohen’s new book America Solved proposes new family law to heal America. … Read the post America Solved: Alan Cohen's cry for family-law reform