
Author: Douglas Galbi
what do men want? Gattula shows women’s misunderstandings

Many women don’t understand why men prefer to be pigs. Some think that men are dogs (if not u, Doug!), ready to snap their leashes as soon as a woman shakes her bones. No one today dares tell women the truth about women and men. But back in the sixth century in Vandal north Africa, Luxorius wrote Latin poetry fearlessly. Consider his poem to the ugly exotic dancer Gattula:
To an ugly lutist
When you dance, Gattula, your wretched body
gives no one pleasure, you horrid one.
You instead prove yourself to be an insane lutist
who makes her ugly face worse with her gyrations,
and, as long as you displease, prompts everyone’s jokes.
Do you believe that your finger-cymbals delight the public?
No one possesses such a judgment of mind
that he wouldn’t, on account of you, abandon that joy.{In psaltriam foedam
Cum saltas misero, Gattula, corpore
nec cuiquam libitum est, horrida, quod facis.
Insanam potius te probo psaltriam,
quae foedam faciem motibus ingravas,
et, dum displiceas, quosque patras iocos.
Credis quod populos cymbala mulceant?
Nemo iudicium tale animi gerit
pro te ut non etiam gaudia deserat.} [1]
Not just any exotic dancing girl is alluring to men. As hateful as it is to say today (yes, you can dance even if you’re obese), most men want a woman with an attractive body and a lovely face.
Throughout the ages, men have commonly been forced to pay for sex under the oppressive social structures of gynocentrism. But what if a woman offered to pay a man for sex? Could money compensate for a woman’s ugliness, or even for her anti-meninist attitude? In another poem to Gattula, Luxorius delivered a clear answer:
Another about the same {Gattula}, who promised a bribe to be loved
Why do you make a promise of payment, Gattula, to be loved?
Give payment so that you won’t hate yourself at the same time!
Why waste your bribes? Why promise gifts to so many men?
Accept payment from me for not giving me anything!
There is no lover so passionate and equally insane
that he doesn’t believe you are a monstrous evil.
But if some fornicator should happen to rise from the dead,
whom somebody like you pleases, give your gifts to him!{Item de ea, quod ut amaretur praemia promittebat
Quid facis ut pretium promittens, Gattula, ameris?
Da pretium ne te oderis ipsa simul!
Praemia cur perdis? Cur spondes munera tantis?
Accipe tu pretium ne mihi dona feras!
Non est tam petulans pariterque insanus amator
qui te non credat prodigiale malum.
Sed si forte aliquis moechus surrexit ab umbris,
cui talis placeas, huic tua dona dato!} [2]
Gattula apparently offers Luxorius money to have sex with her. In the second line, Luxorius proposes that she pay him for not having sex with her in return for her payment. The underlying understanding is that a woman paying money to have sex with a man is shameful and reason for her self-hate. That understanding reflects the social construction of women’s superior sexual value relative to men. In the fourth line, Luxorius even offers to pay Gattula for not having sex with him. That line ironically gestures to social belief that, whatever the circumstances, men must pay money to women. In any case, Luxorius isn’t willing to have sex with Gattula even if she pays him. No amount of money can compensate for a woman’s ugliness and anti-meninist attitude.
The concluding image of a fornicator rising from the dead shows Luxorius’s poetic creativity and daring. In sixth-century Vandal north Africa, both Christianity and more traditional Greco-Roman beliefs were vibrant cultural resources. Just as Luxorius apparently created a counterpart to Jerome’s Paula, here Luxorius seems to have created a counterpart to Jesus. In Luxorius’s time and place, Jesus of Nazareth undoubtedly was the most famous person that many claimed to have risen from the dead. No one believed that Jesus was a fornicator. A woman like Gattula would not have pleased Jesus. Yet Jesus invites all sinners to come to him for forgiveness, love, and personal transformation. Jesus would have accepted Gattula’s sincere gift of self to him.
Even most Christian men don’t quite manage to be exactly like Jesus. A woman must appreciate not just what a man wants, but also what a man actually is.
* * * * *
Read more:
- Marina, love goddess as well as saint, is true heroine to men
- Solon, wisdom, and men’s sexual welfare
- loathly lady Dame Ragnell: fantasy of fulfilling women’s desires
Notes:
[1] Anthologia Latina 356 (R361), from Latin my translation, with help from Rosenblum (1961) p. 157 (poem 75) and Starks (2011) p. 252. The Latin text is from Riese & Shackleton Bailey (1982) p. 279, with my minor adaptations to the editorial presentation. Rosenblum has a nearly identical Latin text, but in line 5 has the primary manuscript reading feras rather than Shackleton’s emendation patras.
Gattula is an unusual name probably associated with a racially mixed woman. Starks (2011) p. 253.
[2] Anthologia Latina 357 (R362), cited as for Anthologia Latina 356. The titles to this and the previous epigram are probably not original to Luxorius.
Aristophanes indicates that some men were willing to accept gifts and money for having sex with ugly, old women. In Aristophanes’s Thesmophoriazusae (Women at the Festival), a women curses “an old hag {who} seduces with gifts the boyfriend of a young girl.” Thesmophoriazusae l. 344, from Greek trans. George Theodoridis. In Plutus (Wealth), an old woman explains of her “lovely young stud of a lover”:
He was so modest with his requests. Very much so. For instance, he’d ask for, say, twenty drachmas for a cloak, or eight drachmas for a pair of shoes… and he’d get me to buy little skirts for his sisters or a dress for his mum… once he asked me for a sack of wheat…
Plutus, l. 981-7, from Greek trans. Theodoridis.
[image] Reclining oni. Ink and watercolor decoration on paper fan. By Kobayashi Kiyochika in late 19th-early 20th century Japan. Item S2003.8.1314, from the Robert O. Muller Collection of the Sackler Gallery, Washington, DC.
References:
Riese, Alexander, and David R. Shackleton Bailey. 1982. Anthologia latina: sive poesis latinae supplementum. Pars. 1. Carmina in codicibus scripta. Fasc. 1. Libri Salmasiani aliorumque carmina. Stutgardiae: In aedibus Teubneri. Online prior edition: Riese (1894).
Rosenblum, Morris. 1961. Luxorius: a Latin poet among the Vandals; together with a text of the poems and an English translation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Starks, John H., Jr. 2011. “Was Black Beautiful in Vandal Africa?” Ch. 14 (pp. 239-57) in Orrells, Daniel, Gurminder K. Bhambra, and Tessa Roynon, eds. African Athena: new agendas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Menelaus ordered forgetfulness in response to Helen’s betrayal & lies

Telemachus and Pisistratus arrived at King Menelaus’s palace during the double wedding of Hermione and Megapenthes. Hermione, a golden-haired, breath-taking beauty, was the daughter of Menelaus and his wife Helen. Megapenthes, Menelaus’s strong, full-grown son, was born of Menelaus’s mistress during the time that Helen had left him for Paris. Amid the great joy and merriment of the double wedding, bitter memories clung to Helen and Menelaus.
Menelaus and Helen recognized Telemachus as being Odysseus’s son. Odysseus had fought with Menelaus in the brutal Trojan War to restore Helen to Menelaus. Menelaus mournfully recalled “all who perished then / on the wide plain of Troy, far from the lush, Greek meadow of Argos {οἳ τότ’ ὄλοντο / Τροίῃ ἐν εὐρείῃ ἑκὰς Ἄργεος ἱπποβότοιο}.” Menelaus grieved most sorely — “for me relentless, heartbreaking grief {ἐμοὶ δ’ ἄχος αἰὲν ἄλαστον}” — about Odysseus’s fate. Poring over his memory of Odysseus, Menelaus remembered that no one had struggled harder than Odysseus to win the war. Recognizing herself as the “shameless whore that I was {ὅτ’ ἐμεῖο κυνώπιδος},” Helen acknowledged that she was the cause of the horrible violence against men at Troy.[1] The double wedding became a fierce battle of emotions.
To win the emotional battle at dinner, Helen drugged everyone. As queen of Sparta, Helen surely wasn’t responsible for working in the kitchen. But she added significantly to the preparation of the wine:
into the wine they were drinking she promptly slipped a drug
heart’s-ease, dissolving anger, magic to make all forget pains.{ αὐτίκ’ ἄρ’ εἰς οἶνον βάλε φάρμακον, ἔνθεν ἔπινον,
νηπενθές τ’ ἄχολόν τε, κακῶν ἐπίληθον ἁπάντων.}
Then she told a tale about Odysseus:
Scarring his own body with mortifying strokes,
throwing filthy rags on his back like any slave,
he slipped into the enemy’s city, roamed its streets —
all disguised, a totally different man, a beggar,
hardly the figure he cut among Achaea’s ships.
That’s how Odysseus infiltrated Troy,
and no one knew him at all …
I alone, I spotted him for the man he was,
kept questioning him — the crafty one kept dodging.
But after I’d bathed him, rubbed him down with oil,
given him clothes to wear and sworn a binding oath
not to reveal him as Odysseus to the Trojans, not
till he was back at his swift ships and shelters,
then at last he revealed to me, step by step,
the whole Achaean strategy. And once he’d cut
a troop of Trojans down with his long bronze sword,
back he went to his comrades, filled with information.{ αὐτόν μιν πληγῇσιν ἀεικελίῃσι δαμάσσας,
σπεῖρα κάκ᾽ ἀμφ᾽ ὤμοισι βαλών, οἰκῆι ἐοικώς,
ἀνδρῶν δυσμενέων κατέδυ πόλιν εὐρυάγυιαν:
ἄλλῳ δ᾽ αὐτὸν φωτὶ κατακρύπτων ἤισκε,
δέκτῃ , ὃς οὐδὲν τοῖος ἔην ἐπὶ νηυσὶν Ἀχαιῶν.
τῷ ἴκελος κατέδυ Τρώων πόλιν, οἱ δ᾽ ἀβάκησαν
πάντες : ἐγὼ δέ μιν οἴη ἀνέγνων τοῖον ἐόντα,
καί μιν ἀνηρώτων : ὁ δὲ κερδοσύνῃ ἀλέεινεν.
ἀλλ᾽ ὅτε δή μιν ἐγὼ λόεον καὶ χρῖον ἐλαίῳ,
ἀμφὶ δὲ εἵματα ἕσσα καὶ ὤμοσα καρτερὸν ὅρκον
μὴ μὲν πρὶν Ὀδυσῆα μετὰ Τρώεσσ᾽ ἀναφῆναι,
πρίν γε τὸν ἐς νῆάς τε θοὰς κλισίας τ᾽ ἀφικέσθαι,
καὶ τότε δή μοι πάντα νόον κατέλεξεν Ἀχαιῶν.
πολλοὺς δὲ Τρώων κτείνας ταναήκεϊ χαλκῷ
ἦλθε μετ᾽ Ἀργείους , κατὰ δὲ φρόνιν ἤγαγε πολλήν. }
Menelaus wasn’t drugged enough to lose his mind. He sarcastically responded to Helen:
Truly, wife, all this you have told rightly.
{ ναὶ δὴ ταῦτά γε πάντα, γύναι, κατὰ μοῖραν ἔειπες. }
Then Menelaus told what had actually happened:
What work the hero Odysseus dared and carried off
in the wooden horse where all our best encamped,
our champions armed with bloody death for Troy …
when along you came, Helen — roused, no doubt,
by a dark power bent on giving Troy some glory,
and dashing Prince Deiphobus squired your every step.
Three times you sauntered round our hollow ambush,
feeling, stroking its flanks,
challenging all our fighters, calling each by name —
yours was the voice of all our long-lost wives!
And Diomedes and I, crouched tight in the midst
with great Odysseus, hearing you singing out,
were both keen to spring up and sally forth
or give you a sudden answer from inside,
but Odysseus damped our ardor, reined us back.
Then all the rest of the troops kept stock-still,
all but Anticlus. He was hot to salute you now
but Odysseus clamped his great hands on the man’s mouth
and shut it, brutally — yes, he saved us all.{ τρὶς δὲ περίστειξας κοῖλον λόχον ἀμφαφόωσα,
ἐκ δ᾽ ὀνομακλήδην Δαναῶν ὀνόμαζες ἀρίστους,
πάντων Ἀργείων φωνὴν ἴσκουσ᾽ ἀλόχοισιν.
αὐτὰρ ἐγὼ καὶ Τυδεΐδης καὶ δῖος Ὀδυσσεὺς
ἥμενοι ἐν μέσσοισιν ἀκούσαμεν ὡς ἐβόησας.
νῶι μὲν ἀμφοτέρω μενεήναμεν ὁρμηθέντε
ἢ ἐξελθέμεναι, ἢ ἔνδοθεν αἶψ᾽ ὑπακοῦσαι:
ἀλλ᾽ Ὀδυσεὺς κατέρυκε καὶ ἔσχεθεν ἱεμένω περ.
ἔνθ᾽ ἄλλοι μὲν πάντες ἀκὴν ἔσαν υἷες Ἀχαιῶν,
Ἄντικλος δὲ σέ γ᾽ οἶος ἀμείψασθαι ἐπέεσσιν
ἤθελεν. ἀλλ᾽ Ὀδυσεὺς ἐπὶ μάστακα χερσὶ πίεζεν
νωλεμέως κρατερῇσι, σάωσε δὲ πάντας Ἀχαιούς. }
Helen became the Trojan prince Deiphobus’s mistress after her Trojan lover Paris died in the war. Despite Helen’s tale, Menelaus evidently believed that Helen sought to betray him and his Greek compatriots to the Trojans. Yet Menelaus didn’t harm Helen. He accepted her back as his wife and even slept in the same bed as her. How could he do that?
Quintus of Smyrna’s Posthomerica narrates how Menelaus coped with Helen’s betrayal. After the feast upon the Greeks’ return home, Menelaus and Helen lay in bed together. They said nothing to each other. Neither slept. Helen broke their silence:
Don’t start being angry, Menelaus, with me.
I did not leave your home and bed of my own accord.
But mighty Alexander {Paris} and the sons of Troy
came and snatched me away while you were far from home.
I was constantly seeking to die a miserable death,
by means of the cruel noose or else by the lethal sword,
but people in the palace used soothing words to stop me,
in spite of the grief I felt for you and our dear daughter.
For her sake, for our wedded joy and for your own sake
I beg you to forget the terrible trouble I’ve caused you.{ Μή νύ μοι, ὦ Μενέλαε, χόλον ποτιβάλλεο θυμῷ·
οὐ γὰρ ἐγὼν ἐθέλουσα λίπον σέο δῶμα καὶ εὐνήν,
ἀλλά μ’ Ἀλεξάνδροιο βίη καὶ Τρώιοι υἷες
σεῦ ἀπὸ νόσφιν ἐόντος ἀνηρείψαντο κιόντες.
καί μ’ ἄμοτον μεμαυῖαν ὀιζυρῶς ἀπολέσθαι
ἢ βρόχῳ ἀργαλέῳ ἢ καὶ ξίφεϊ στονόεντι
εἶργον ἐνὶ μεγάροισι παρηγορέοντες ἔπεσσι
σεῦ ἕνεκ’ ἀχνυμένην καὶ τηλυγέτοιο θυγατρός·
τῆς νύ σε πρός τε γάμου πολυγηθέος ἠδὲ σεῦ αὐτοῦ
λίσσομαι ἀμφ’ ἐμέθεν στυγερῆς λελαθέσθαι ἀνίης. }[2]
Helen thus lied to her husband. Then she didn’t beg for his forgiveness. She begged for his forgetfulness.[3] The “wise {φρονέων}” Menelaus then endorsed forgetfulness:
Stop thinking now about the suffering of our hearts.
Let that all be locked inside the black abode
of oblivion. It’s wrong to keep recalling evil deeds.{ Μηκέτι νῦν μέμνησ’ ἅ τ’ ἐπάσχομεν ἄλγεα θυμῷ·
ἀλλὰ τὰ μέν που πάντα μέλας δόμος ἐντὸς ἐέργοι
Λήθης· οὐ γὰρ ἔοικε κακῶν μεμνῆσθαι ἔτ’ ἔργων. }
Forgetfulness isn’t a reasonable way to deal with a woman like Helen, a serial liar who put men in great danger. Back in Troy, when Menelaus found Helen within the innermost part of the palace, he was going to kill her. But she showed him her bare breasts and his inanimate sword drooped:
Strange amazement came over him, and seeing her brilliant
beauty he could no longer put his sword to her throat.
He stood there like a trunk of dead wood in a mountain
forest, which neither the swift blasts of the north wind
can shake when they hurtle through the air nor those of the south.
Like that, astonished, he stayed a long time, his strength quite broken
by the sight of his consort. Suddenly gone from his mind
were all the wrongs that she had done to their marriage bed.{ τῷ δ’ ἄρα θάμβος ἄελπτον ἐπήλυθεν, οὐδ’ ἄρ’ ἔτ’ ἔτλη
κάλλος ἰδὼν ἀρίδηλον ἐπὶ ξίφος αὐχένι κῦρσαι·
ἀλλ’ ὥς τε ξύλον αὖον ἐν οὔρεϊ ὑλήεντι
εἱστήκει, τό περ οὔτε θοαὶ Βορέαο θύελλαι
ἐσσύμεναι κλονέουσι δι’ ἠέρος οὔτε Νότοιο·
ὣς ὃ ταφὼν μένε δηρόν, ὑπεκλάσθη δέ οἱ ἀλκὴ
δερκομένου παράκοιτιν. ἄφαρ δ’ ὅ γε λήσατο πάντων
ὅσσά οἱ ἐν λεχέεσσιν ἐνήλιτε κουριδίοισι· }[4]
Later, in their marriage bed, after Helen broke their silence with her lies, they physically united:
Joyfully then they lay down side by side
and their hearts recalled how they were joined in marriage.
Just as ivy and a grapevine intertwine
their stems so closely together that no wind is ever
strong enough to separate them, thus those two
clung closely in the passionate embrace of love.{ ἀσπασίως δ’ ἄρα τώ γε παρ’ ἀλλήλοισι κλιθέντε
σφωιτέρου κατὰ θυμὸν ἀνεμνήσαντο γάμοιο.
ὡς δ’ ὅτε που κισσός τε καὶ ἡμερὶς ἀμφιβάλωνται
ἀλλήλοις περὶ πρέμνα, τὰ δ’ οὔ ποτε ἲς ἀνέμοιο
σφῶν ἀπὸ νόσφι βαλέσθαι ἐπισθένει· ὣς ἄρα τώ γε
ἀλλήλοις συνέχοντο λιλαιόμενοι φιλότητος. }
A beautiful woman can go unpunished despite causing many men’s deaths. She can get away with telling extravagant lies as excuses. She can conquer the greatest military and intellectual heroes. With respect to women, Menelaus was a poor leader in endorsing forgetfulness. Men must remember Helen’s words and deeds. Men must understand their own weaknesses and avoid becoming entangled with poison ivy in the form of a Helenish woman.
A woman who deserves to die finds love again from her prior lover,
restored to the victor and his bed’s delights.Hell-hawk, why do you escape? Not yourself betrayed, you others betray!
As cause of the disaster, why don’t you also fall in the disaster?{ Femina digna mori redamatur amore priori
reddita victori deliciisque tori.Saeva, quid evadis? non tradita cetera tradis!
Cur rea tu cladis non quoque clade cadis? }[5]
* * * * *
Read more:
- Troilus’s death-seeking: Chaucer vs. Boccaccio & Shakespeare
- Omphale pummeled Hercules: not just ancient Greek myth
- Yvain & Gawain: men fighting for women should talk with each other
Notes:
[1] Homer, The Odyssey 4.98-9 (all who died), 4.108 (relentless, heart-breaking grief), 4.145 (shameless whore), ancient Greek text from Alpheios, Englist trans. from Fagles (1996) pp. 127-9 (with my minor changes). The Greek text, with a linear English translation, is also available through the excellent Chicago Homer site. Subsequent quotations from the Odyssey (cited by Greek lines and pages in Fagles’s translation) are similarly 4.220-2, p. 131 (into the wine…); 4.244-58, p. 132 (scarring his own body…); 4.266, p. 132 (there was a tale…); 4.271-88, p. 133 (what a piece of work…).
[2] Quintus of Smyrna, Posthomerica 14.155-64, ancient Greek text from Hopkinson (2018), English trans. James (2004) p. 224 (with my minor changes). Subsequent quotes from Posthomerica are similarly sourced. For an earlier, freely available ancient Greek text and English translation, Way (1913).
Earlier Helen indicated that Paris hadn’t forced her to elope with him to Troy. Speaking to Paris within her own mind, Helen lamented:
How I wish the Harpies had long ago carried me off,
when I first followed you under some deadly doom of heaven.{ ὡς ὄφελόν μ’ Ἅρπυιαι ἀνηρείψαντο πάροιθεν,
ὁππότε σοί γ’ ἑπόμην ὀλοῇ ὑπὸ Δαίμονος Αἴσῃ. }
Posthomerica 10.395-6, trans. James (2004) p. 173. The narrator explains:
Her words were less a lament for her husband than tearful regret
for the terrible wrong she had done.{ Ὣς ἔφατ’ οὔ τι γοῶσα πόσιν τόσον ὁππόσον αἰνῆς
μύρετ’ ἀλιτροσύνης μεμνημένη. }
Id. 10.406-7.
Subsequent quotes above (cited by line numbers and pages in James translation) are from 14.166-8, p. 224 (stop thinking…); 13.393-400, p. 215 (strange amazement…); 14.173-8, p. 224 (joyfully then…).
[3] On Helen’s lies, Maciver (2011). Making excuses was a common action in the traditional Greco-Roman understanding of reconciliation for interpersonal wrongs. Konstan (2010). Christian understanding and practice of forgiveness was rather different. Konstan cites the words of Charles Griswold: “forgiving cannot be forgetting.” Id. p. 64
[4] Helen similarly over-powered the other Greek warriors who survived the Trojan War. When Helen boarded the Greek ship with other captive Trojan women for the journey back from Troy to Greece:
Round her the soldiers
marveled at the sight of that flawless woman’s
splendid beauty and loveliness. Not one of them dared
attack her with abusive words even in secret,
still less openly. They stared as though at a goddess,
with delight, for she was a sight they had all longed for.{ ἀμφὶ δὲ λαοὶ
θάμβεον ἀθρήσαντες ἀμωμήτοιο γυναικὸς
ἀγλαΐην καὶ κάλλος ἐπήρατον· οὐδέ τις ἔτλη
κείνην οὔτε κρυφηδὸν ἐπεσβολίῃσι χαλέψαι
οὔτ’ οὖν ἀμφαδίην, ἀλλ’ ὡς θεὸν εἰσορόωντο
ἀσπασίως· πᾶσιν γὰρ ἐελδομένοισι φαάνθη.
ὡς δ’ ὅτ’ ἀλωομένοισι δι’ ἀκαμάτοιο θαλάσσης
πατρὶς ἑὴ μετὰ δηρὸν ἐπευχομένοισι φανείη }
Posthomerica 14.57-64, trans. James (2004) p. 221. Merely to test his fellow Greek men’s devaluation of their own lives, Menelaus had earlier spoken more sensibly:
that shameless whore Helen — she is of less
concern to me than you who are killed before my eyes
in battle. Good riddance to her and her utterly puny
paramour. Heaven emptied her heart of all good sense
the day she abandoned my home and marriage bed.
Now Priam and Troy shall concern themselves for her affairs.
Let us be on our way at once. It’s better by far
to escape the horrors of war than to be destroyed.{ Ἑλένης τε κυνώπιδος, ἀμφὶ δὲ λαοὶ
θάμβεον ἀθρήσαντες ἀμωμήτοιο γυναικὸς
ἀγλαΐην καὶ κάλλος ἐπήρατον· οὐδέ τις ἔτλη
κείνην οὔτε κρυφηδὸν ἐπεσβολίῃσι χαλέψαι
οὔτ’ οὖν ἀμφαδίην, ἀλλ’ ὡς θεὸν εἰσορόωντο
ἀσπασίως· πᾶσιν γὰρ ἐελδομένοισι φαάνθη.
ὡς δ’ ὅτ’ ἀλωομένοισι δι’ ἀκαμάτοιο θαλάσσης
πατρὶς ἑὴ μετὰ δηρὸν ἐπευχομένοισι φανείη }
Id. 6.24-31, p. 98. Aeneas also failed to punish Helen in the Aeneid. Compared to women, men are subject to harsher punishment and more violence. Gynocentric society consistently devalues men’s lives.
[5] “I want to weep for Troy, given up to the Greeks by Fate alone {Pergama flere volo, fato Danais data solo}” (Carmina Burana 101), st. 14-5, Latin text and English translation (with my minor changes) from Traill (2018) vol. 1, pp. 438-41. “Pergama flere volo” apparently dates to the first third of the twelfth century. It has survived in at least 66 manuscripts. Id. p. 564. William Caxton’s Recuyell of the Hystoryes of Troye, printed in Bruges in 1473, concludes with an cento built from “Pergama flere volo.”
[image] Clouds of oblivion. Photograph by Douglas Galbi.
References:
Fagles, Robert, trans. 1996. Homer. The Odyssey. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking.
Hopkinson, Neil, ed. and trans. 2018. Quintus Smyrnaeus. Posthomerica. Loeb Classical Library 19 (new version). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, Alan, trans. 2004. Quintus of Smyrna. The Trojan Epic: Posthomerica. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Konstan, David. 2010. Before Forgiveness: the origins of a moral idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maciver, Calum A. 2011. “Reading Helen’s excuses in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica.” Classical Quarterly. 61 (2): 690-703.
Traill, David A. 2018, ed. and trans. Carmina Burana. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library, 48-49. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Way, Arthur Sanders, ed. and trans. 1913. Quintus Smyrnaeus. The Fall of Troy. Loeb Classical Library 19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (alternate presentation)
Luxorius refigured Jerome’s patron Paula as oft-remarrying widow

Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus, now commonly known as Saint Jerome, was a prominent scholar and writer in the Roman Empire in the early fifth century. One of Jerome’s patrons and close companions was Paula. She was an elite Roman woman who had been widowed. With Jerome’s vigorous encouragement, Paula never remarried. She instead pursued a life of Christian chastity, piety, and study. Writing in Vandal north Africa in the early sixth century, Luxorius seems to have re-figured Paula as a widow who killed three husbands. Luxorius’s Paula eagerly sought a fourth husband, even though he was incapable of having sex with her.
Anacreonitic-meter poem to an impotent doctor who married a woman widowed three times
After so many tombs have been filled,
and crowds of funerals
and various husbands
ill-fatedly killed
by a wrinkled old woman,
you now, surgeon,
are pleased to be called her fourth husband.
But you, although alive, are entombed,
for you lack the proper member
without which no marriage can be held together.
Now I ask, who understands
Paula having married again?
Nobody! Why then did she do this?
She desired to change quickly
the mourning clothes that she,
a nefarious wife, had obtained,
so that a fourth and then fifth
husband can come.{Anacreontium in medicum inpotentem, qui ter viduam duxit uxorem
Post tot repleta busta
et funerum catervas
ac dispares maritos,
rugosa quos peremit
fatis anus sinistris,
tu nunc, chirurge, quartus
coniunx vocate plaudis.
Sed vivus es sepultus,
dum parte qua decebat
nil contines mariti.
Iam posco, cui videtur
nupsisse Paula rursus?
Nulli. Quid ergo fecit?
Mutare mox lugubrem
quam sumpserat cupivit
uxor nefanda vestem,
ut quartus atque quintus
possit venire coniunx.} [1]
Luxorius almost surely knew of Jerome and Paula. Jerome translated Hebrew scripture and the New Testament into Latin to make the influential Vulgate Bible. Moreover, Jerome corresponded with Augustine of Hippo, a prominent church leader and scholar in north Africa. Christianity was an important strand in the vibrant Roman culture of early sixth-century Vandal north Africa. Scholars have commonly assumed that Luxorius was Christian.[2] Even if Luxorius wasn’t Christian, Jerome and Paula were probably well-known in Luxorius’s elite Roman circles.
Luxorius’s Paula isn’t the conventional, extremely lustful widow. Her immoderate desire isn’t sexual. She even marries a man who is impotent. Her desire seems to be to acquire and kill husbands. She is thoroughly evil — a nefarious woman who continually seeks to remarry. Jerome’s Paula came to be venerated as a saint. Luxorius’s Paula is a particularly perverse counterpart to Jerome’s Paula.[3]
Luxorius’s Paula may have been a poetic response to moral polarization among religious factions in north Africa. Manichaeans, with whom the young Augustine had considerable contact, emphasized duality of good and evil. Donatists, who were particularly important in Carthage, rejected any Christian accommodation with worldly powers. Donatists insisted on living in rigorous adherence to Christian moral ideals. Whether as a Christian or as a follower of more traditional Greco-Roman beliefs, Luxorius seems to have understood the world through particular, unusual persons, rather than through moral abstractions.
* * * * *
Read more:
- Marina, love goddess as well as saint, is true heroine to men
- Omphale pummeled Hercules: not just ancient Greek myth
- religious diversity and religious competition in ancient China
Notes:
[1] Anthologia Latina 304 (R309), from Latin my translation, with help from Rosenblum (1961) pp. 125, 127. Id. numbers the poem 23. The Latin text is from Riese & Shackleton Bailey (1982) pp. 249-50, with my minor adaptations to the editorial presentation. Rosenblum has a nearly identical Latin text.
[2] Rosenblum (1961) p. 45. Evidence put forward for Luxorius being a Christian is rather weak. Id. pp. 46-8. Irrespective of Luxorius’s personal beliefs, he probably had considerable knowledge of Christian beliefs and culture. In one poem, he seems to have expanded upon the figure of Saint Marina.
[3] Luxorius’s account of Paula is obviously unrealistic. A surgeon, even if his is impotent, is unlikely to be foolish enough to marry a woman who has killed her previous three husbands.
[image] Judith Beheading Holofernes. Cf. Judith 10:11–13:10. Oil painting by Caravaggio, c. 1598-9. Held in Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Antica, Rome. Thanks to Wikimedia Commons.
References:
Riese, Alexander, and David R. Shackleton Bailey. 1982. Anthologia latina: sive poesis latinae supplementum. Pars. 1. Carmina in codicibus scripta. Fasc. 1. Libri Salmasiani aliorumque carmina. Stutgardiae: In aedibus Teubneri. Online prior edition: Riese (1894).
Rosenblum, Morris. 1961. Luxorius: a Latin poet among the Vandals; together with a text of the poems and an English translation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wednesday’s flowers
